The United States Supreme Court held in Graham v. Florida (2010) and Miller v. Alabama (2012) that children may not be sentenced to life without parole without taking in consideration the unique characteristics of youth. The outcomes in these cases were informed by the research in adolescent development suggesting that teens are not as culpable due to their impulsivity, vulnerability to peer pressure, and their capacity for change. In this training, Roseanne Eckert, the Coordinating Attorney for the Florida Juvenile Resentencing and Review Project at the Florida International University College of Law, explains on the brain science can inform reliable sentencing outcomes.
https://www.crimefreefuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/mri-head-scan-1439617.jpg 512 512 Faith Sills http://www.crimefreefuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/cff-logo.png Faith Sills2017-09-13 10:39:542023-03-08 22:27:48Using Adolescent Brain Science to Inform Reliable Sentencing Outcomes
You might also like
In the “Making a Murderer” Case, the Supreme Court Could Help Address the Problem of False Confessions – The New Yorker